Social dialogue is like peace, everybody
wants it but how do you get it? For global peace the global community disposes
of the United Nations. For the Social Dialogue it is the ILO, the oldest and only tripartite UN organisation, with
its annual peak of the International Labour Conference, held in Geneva. There
Workers’, Employers’ and Government representatives discuss rules that should
govern labour relation worldwide.
Besides the yearly special topics, like
this year for example youth employment and social security, there is the
regular Committee on the Application of Standards, shortly called the ‘Norms
Committee’. Every year complaints of labour right violations in different
countries, mostly presented by Workers’ Organisations, are debated in this
Committee. The facts are presented
in the Report of the Committee of Experts on the Application of Conventions and Recommendations.
Because it is not possible to debate all
cases presented the Committee starts with debates on the list of countries that
should be treated during the sessions.
For the first time in ILO history employer’s representatives refused to
come to an agreement on this list of the 25 ILO member countries where labour
rights were violated. This refusal touches the heart of the ILO since without
checking their compliance the ILO conventions and recommendations are
meaningless. If these violations cannot be discussed anymore the future of the
ILO will be in danger.
There have been always tensions between
Workers’ and Employers’ representatives regarding the Global Social Dialogue,
especially on global rules regarding the right to strike. While employers prefer
national laws and rules above an international Convention, workers’
organisations are promoting international law on the right to strike.
But today there are other motives why
employers refuse to agree. According to observers the Norms Committee is used
to send the message to the recently elected ILO Director General Guy Rider, a
former trade union leader, that
the ILO is not only a workers’ organisation. They even expressed doubts whether ILO
experts and staff are objective in compiling the annual report on the
Application of Conventions and Recommendations. Some press releases speak of
blackmailing the ILO using those who suffer most of the violation of labour
rights like for example in Guatemala, where recently a trade unionist has been
shot to death.
Dear Piet,
ReplyDeletethank you.
You did very good job !
I hope I you will receive this comment.
Have a nice weekend,
Mara
Felicitaciones Piet. Buen trabajo.
ReplyDeleteEsperemos que el futuro de la OIT, se consolide en función del diálogo social y el tripartismo para beneficio de la humanidad.
Maritza Chireno,
Presidenta FETRALCOS
Secretaria General CGT. Venezuela