The question is how and what do you
report about a Conference like the ILO Conference, held as usual in
Geneva in the month of June, where nearly 5000 representatives
discuss in several committees specific items, where there are daily
meetings of the workers, employers and governments and where are held
regularly plenary sessions? Without wishing to be without respect, I
sometimes feel as being in a kind of circus with too many
circus rings so I do not know where to look. May be the most
important and interesting aspect of the ILO Conference is the
opportunity to meet so many people from so many different corners of
the world.
The following three partite committees
(workers, employers and governments) were at work during the
Conference: the Committe on Sustainable development, decent Work and
'Green Jobs', the Committee on Employment and Social Protection in
the New Demographic Context (aging society), the Committee for the Recurrent
Discussion on Social Dialogue and the usual Committee on the
Application of Conventions and Recommendations that examined this
year 26 countries.The ILO Director General presented two reports for
debate: “Towards the ILO centenary: Realities, Renewal and
Tripartite commitment” and “The situation of workers of the
occupied Arab territories.” The observations and conclusions from
each Committee as well as the results of the debates on the ILO
Director's Reports have been published on the ILO website.
WOW executive secretary Bjorn van Heusden meets during the ILO Conference ILO Actrav staff member Amrita Sietaram. |
The most 'political' Committee is the
one on the Application of Conventions and Recommendations. The
Conference examined 25 individual cases of problems in the
application of labour rights and one case of progress (Miyanmar). The
25 cases concern the following countries: Bangladesh, Belarus,
Cambodia, Canada, Chad, Dominican Republic, Egypt, Fiji, Greece,
Guatemala, Honduras, Islamic Republic of Iran, Kenya, Republic of
Korea, Malaysia, Mauritania, Pakistan, Paraguay, Saudi Arabia,
Senegal, Spain, Swaziland, Turkey, Uzbekistan and Zimbabwe.The
Committee drew special attention to three cases: Belarus, Fiji and
Uzbekistan.
The other important topics of this year
were the social dialogue, 'green jobs' and aging society. On paper, all
Member States of the ILO endorse the importance of social dialogue.
That this is not always the case in practice, is to be expected in
undemocratic countries. But for example, there are EU countries in
South and Eastern Europe, that due to the crisis do not respect
anymore the social dialogue. Countries with emerging economies,
particularly in Latin America, see the crisis as an opportunity to
strengthen the social dialogue. Especially in established economies,
the social dialogue is under attack. The ILO calls this global trend
a race to the middle.
WOW vice president Koffi Crysanthe Zounnadjala (in the middle between 2 colleagues) is also the WOW coordinator of WOW delegates to the ILO Conference. |
The trend that companies are
increasingly less bound by national borders, is continuing.
Production often stretches out over several countries. That makes
companies also responsible to respect the labor conventions in the
international 'production chain' and not only in the country where
their headquarters stands. The ILO intends to cooperate more
directly with multinational corporations and trade unions. This
enables companies and their suppliers to establish the same labour
standards in different countries. To ensure compliance with these
standards, it is necessary to support the creation of a good system
of control. The ILO should therefore do more research and develop
more activities about this globalization of production.
An important outcome of the discussion
in the Committee on Social Dialogue is that the ILO will focus more
on the sustainability of international production chains. A decision
that undoubtedly is linked to the recent disaster in Bangladesh.The
impact of the flexibilisation of the labor market on the social
dialogue and on collective bargaining were also subject of
discussion.
This topic is also clearly reflected in
the agenda for the future presented by the ILO Director General Guy
Ryder on the eve of the conference. He stressed that the ILO will
engage in discussions about the changing world of
labour(flexibility). At the end of the Conference he said that “a
forward-looking examination of the place of work in our lives and
societies is needed. It will frame policy choices and it will be
appropriate to the marking of the ILO’s 100th anniversary.” He
added to this, that “there was widespread interest in defining and
implementing an ILO role in respect of global supply chains and more
generally in respect of corporate social responsibility.”
For this blog I used texts of the
blogs produced by Martijn Hordijk from CNV Netherlands and who was
the official workers' representative in the Dutch delegation.
No comments:
Post a Comment