CLAT Secretary General Emilo Maspero at the VII CLAT Congress in San José, Costa Rica, November 1977 |
Has the death of CLAT General Secretary
Emilio Maspero in the year 2000 something to do with the fall of the
WVA? Some believe so. They think, that if Emilio Maspero would be
still alive that CLAT and WCL probably still would exist. I suspect
too, but of course I am not sure about it. Why the suspicion? Because
Maspero was unquestionably a man with a clear vision,
self-confidence, strategic insight, authority and independence.
The Dominican trade union leader,
former General Secretary of the FEMTAA (International Federation of
Workers in Food and Agriculture) and now General Secretary of the
CLATJUP (Latin American Federation of Pensioners) José Gomez Cerda
has known Emilio Maspero for nearly a lifetime. He characterizes
Maspero as follows in his in Spanish written blog “Emilio Maspero: el dirigente sindical" :
Emilio Maspero speaking at the opening of the VII CLAT Congress. |
"The charisma of Maspero
had to do with his style as a speaker: frank, clear, lucid, with good
intonation, clear ideas, profound messages, excellent diction,
proposals for problems and a message of hope for the future of the
workers. He was able to excite people, he always left a reflection
for the listeners. Emilio spoke from the heart, and he believed what
he said, thus convincing the audience.
After “America Latina, Hora Cero”
he did not write many books, but if you would collect all his ideas,
you could publish dozens of books with his works.
As ideologue Emilio had clear
thoughts, he was an intellectual, a philosopher with humanistic and
christian principles, he always presented the Christian social
doctrine, adapted to the workers, to the trade unions, he never
denied being a Christian, on the contrary he told everybody
everywhere.
As strategist Máspero knew
where he was going, what were his objectives (which were those of
CLAT) and where he wanted to arrive. He knew to detect who the
opponents were, and "how to distinguish to unite" . He knew
also to listen to all sectors, to read,to study and to write,
(although this looks easy, this is very difficult for an
international leader who is permanently in action), what always kept
him aware of all world events.
As tactician, Emilio knew how
to use human and financial resources, so that they could better serve
the cause. He had a natural flair for understanding situations and
people.
As a trade union politician,
he was an example of daily work with an incalculable production, of
permanent action, at the events, where problems existed, always
giving input, criteria, suggestions, ideas, reflections. He made
every effort to fulfill his promises. As a good executive his first
work was to fulfill and to enforce the agreements and resolutions of
the management bodies.
These virtues, together in one
intelligent leader with the privileged memory of time for events,
people, dates and appointments, made of him one of the best
international and world leaders, because his contributions were not
only for CLAT, but also for his duties as Vice President of the World
Confederation of Labour (WCL), which allowed him to give his views,
opinions and ideas in global seminars, conferences and meetings.”
Emilio Maspero was a charismatic trade union leader and therefore 40 years the uncontested Secretary General of CLAT . |
Emilio Maspero was
therefore the uncontested leader of CLAT at the beginning of the
sixties of the last century until his death in 2000. You can
characterize him as a Latin American caudillo for trade unions. A
caudillo has its positive sides, as mentioned above by Gomez Cerda,
but there are also negative aspects.
Through his
indisputable leadership Maspero had become CLAT over the years. The
result was that after some time no fresh blood came into the
organization. For a democratic organization like CLAT renewal of
leadership and governance is vital so that new insights, changes and
structures get a chance. The lack of innovation at the top led to
stagnation in leadership and ideas and that probably has been one of
the reasons that only six years after the death of Maspero, CLAT
disappeared.
Another reason is
probably the lack of sufficient financial resources to maintain the
Latin American trade union empire built up with the help of foreign
aid. Training and education centers were distributed across the
continent, with the Latin American Workers University UTAL in
Venezuela as a spider in the web. The UTAL was an original idea of
Maspero intended as an instrument for the emancipation of Latin
American workers and the people. Led by Maspero, CLAT made training
and educational the heart of its action in response to the lack of
education for the common man and the high illiteracy rate in Latin
America. A costly challenge for a trade union because education is
expensive and could therefore not be achieved without financial
support from outside.
But foreign aid is
a double edged sword. In most countries of Latin America, the trade
unions could not afford such training and education institutes. Also
in Europe, unions are helped by their governments or employers with
grants to finance their education and training structures. But
financing from outside may also be an obstacle to the development of
initiative and personal responsibility. It undermines self-finance
of activities and structures. Maspero and CLAT have not been able to
find a satisfactory solution to this issue.
This had its impact
on the WCL. The WCL financially always has been a European affair.
With the departure of the French (CFDT) and Dutch Catholic trade
union confederations (NKV) in 1973 during the XVIII Congress of the
WCL in Evian, France, the financing of the WCL became even a matter
of only a few European countries with Belgium as first , Netherlands
as second and France third. Although CLAT had grown in membership
over the years, however, it appeared barely able to support the WCL
financially.
Rather the reverse
was the case. The WCL was seen by CLAT as a tool to finance the trade
union movement in Latin America. Given the wealth of Europe, this
appeal to European solidarity of CLAT (and unions from other
continents) was understandable but the result was, that despite the
democratic goodwill in the WCL, the ultimate authority stayed in
Europe and particularly in Belgium, because of the enormous
preponderance of the Belgian trade union ACV-CSC in WCL.