Visit to Gdansk during the seminar in Sopot.From right to left: Dan Mogadescu from Cartel alfa, WCL Vice-President Kristoff Dowgiallo, Tadek Oruba from Belgium ACV and Mihael also from Cartel alfa.
|
During the WCL Congress in Caracas
(1989) I heard for the first time I was a candidate to become
confederal secretary. The newly elected general secretary Carlos
Custer even said he was counting on me. Some time later Jaap Kos,
president of the WCL international trade federation WFCW (World
Federation of Clerical Workers which is now WOW), invited me for an
interview with him and two Austrian boardmembers. The WFCW wanted me
to be their executive secretary. To convince the WCL they had decided
to pay an additional contribution to the WCL. Some time later CNV
chairman Henk Hofstede called me, asking if I wanted to work in
Vienna instead of Brussels. There were plans to open a
WCL liaison office in Vienna which is near to the former European communist countries and
Russia. For me this was okay but finally it became nevertheless
Brussels.
Finally in November 1991 in Gdansk, the
decision was taken on my appointment as confederal secretary. Starting in
Brussels in January 1992, it appeared that I was the successor of
Emiel Vervliet, WCL confederal secretary and also executive secretary
of the WFCW. An article by him in the Flemish journal
'Maatschappelijke Gids', in which he made a plea for a merger
between WCL and ICFTU, went too far for secretary general Carlos
Custer. Much later I learned that opinions about my appointment at
the WCL were divided. That was of course unfortunate but it did not
affect my work.
It became a flying take-off. My first
encounter with new union leaders from the former communist European
countries and Russia was at a seminar organized by Solidarnosc in
Sopot, Gdansk (29 February to 4 March 1992). There I met the Polish
WCL Vice-President Kristoff Dowgiałło. I spoke with many new
democratic leaders such as a delegation from Lithuania headed by Aldona
Balsienne, chairman Olexander Iwanchenko of the UkrainianVOST, the
miners' leader Victor Utkin from Russia and a delegation of Cartel
alfa. The Romanian federation Cartel alfa had already joined the WCL
prior to my arrival to the WCL.
The WCL European Section meeting presided by Vice-President Kristoff Dowgiallo. On the left Secretary General Carlos Custer. On the right Confederal Secretary Roger Denis. |
So the WCL had a nice position for
take-off. My WCL mission began with the support of two major trade
confederations in former communist Europe, both known for their
battles for an independent, free and democratic trade union movement.
At the seminar in Sopot it became clear that for these new leaders
Solidarnosc was an example that deserved to be followed. Therefore probably the WCL also would have a certain appeal to these new leaders.
Moreover, I thought, the ideas on man and society of the WCL were in
line with those of the new leaders. After the failure of communism
they were looking for a renewal of their society and state, based on
human and spiritual values others than communism. The WCL could
offer these coming from its Christian and humanistic background that
it cherishes since its foundation in 1929.
Just a few weeks after the seminar in Sopot I went
along on tour in Poland with Leo Dusoleil, President of the World
Federation of Industrial Workers Federation WFIW, and Roel Schepen
of the CNV Wood and Construction Trade Union, to visit the
Solidarnosc unions with the aim to affiliate them to the
International Trade Federations (ITF's) of the WCL (14 they - March
21, 1992). Our interpreter was Tadek Oruba a Belgium trade unionist
of Polish descent. During our visit to the miners union in Katowice
we laid flowers at the monument to fallen miners in the fight against
communism. In Krakow we visited the metal union. In Nova Huta we had
a conversation with the President of the textile union. In Wroclav we
spoke with board members of the energy and chemical union and so on.
Unfortunately, despite our efforts, no
Solidarnosc trade union ever joined the WCL International Trade
Federations. I know the WCL Textile Federation and the Building and
Wood Federation have long taken pains to the Solidarnosc
textile and construction union to make join them but it never happened. It stayed with
vague promises and commitments during visits to Ghent and Brussels.
Despite the enormous efforts of the European Miners with many
seminars and missions organized and financed, also the miners union of Solidarnosc never became a
member of the WFIW.
I never could figure out why the unions
of Solidarnosc did not join the WCL International Trade Federations.
It could not be money. The financial contributions were low, like
those of Solidarnosc self to the WCL. In addition, there was an agreement
to invest the contributions in seminars and other activities in the country
itself. May be the ITF's were not so credible anymore because some
ACV and CNV unions no longer were a member of an WCL International Trade Federation? They had joined the ICFTU oriented ITF's.
Anyway, the many times I've asked, such as Solidarnosc President
Krakliewski, Andrej Adamčik from international affairs and some
regional presidents of Solidarnosc, I was assured that Solidarnosc
was committed to the WCL but otherwise it remained quiet.
On the contrary, the Romanian trade federation
Cartel alfa had the policy to their members to join as much as possible the WCL
International Trade Federations, in many cases
successfully. Therefore the relations between Cartel alfa and WCL
became stronger than those between Solidarnosc and the WCL. I felt sorry,
not only because the WCL became less stronger internationally than I
had hoped but also because personally I felt involved in the fate of
Poland and in particular that of Solidanosc.
Between the seminar in Sopot and the
Polish tour I took part in a meeting of the European Section of the
WCL for the first time on March 7, 1992. The European section meeting
was a kind of informal meeting of all Western European trade union confederations of the WCL where European issues were discussed and views exchanged. In fact it was a meeting of the WCL fraction in the ETUC but it could never be named like that. The informal nature
of the European Section meeting was strongly emphasized. It gave me
the impression that we were doing something, we actually were not
allowed to do because of the unity within ETUC (European Trade Union
Confederation). Apparently, the international trade union movement
became infected with a kind of enlightened Leninism (Lenin is the
creator of the ban on factionalism in the Russian Communist Party,
that later became known by the name of Democratic Centralism used by
all communist parties). WCL members could never present themselves as a a group in the ETUC. The WCL had lost therefore its identity on European level. The question was if it could be maintained on international level. That is what still had to be figured out.
to be continued
The above story is a personal testimony of what happened at the end of the last century and the beginning of the new millennium in the international trade union movement, in particular in CLAT and the WCL.
to be continued
The above story is a personal testimony of what happened at the end of the last century and the beginning of the new millennium in the international trade union movement, in particular in CLAT and the WCL.
No comments:
Post a Comment